DaObjVds retail - #1104
Conversation
Report for GZLE01 (87b5061 - 7e4ff0d)📈 Matched code: 71.11% (+0.07%, +5676 bytes) ✅ 34 new matches
...and 4 more new matches Report for GZLJ01 (87b5061 - 7e4ff0d)📈 Matched code: 69.31% (+0.07%, +5676 bytes) ✅ 34 new matches
...and 4 more new matches Report for GZLP01 (87b5061 - 7e4ff0d)📈 Matched code: 69.26% (+0.07%, +5676 bytes) ✅ 34 new matches
...and 4 more new matches Report for D44J01 (87b5061 - 7e4ff0d)📈 Matched code: 63.44% (+0.06%, +4808 bytes) ✅ 31 new matches
...and 1 more new matches 📈 3 improvements in unmatched items
|
WilliamArnett
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Azur. This should cause the TU to match for retail builds.
| void daObjVds::Act_c::search_switchCB(fopAc_ac_c*) { | ||
| /* Nonmatching */ | ||
| void* daObjVds::Act_c::search_switchCB(fopAc_ac_c* i_actor) { | ||
| if(fopAc_IsActor(i_actor) && fopAcM_GetName(i_actor) == fpcNm_Obj_Swlight_e){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| if(fopAc_IsActor(i_actor) && fopAcM_GetName(i_actor) == fpcNm_Obj_Swlight_e){ | |
| cXyz unused; | |
| if(fopAc_IsActor(i_actor) && fopAcM_GetName(i_actor) == fpcNm_Obj_Swlight_e){ |
|
Got it matching for retail (GZLE01, GZLJ01, GZLP01). D44J01 has a regalloc issue in daObjVds::Act_c::process_common |
#371
Currently, TU is matching in objdiff but not after linking. There is also a regalloc issue in demo.