Skip to content

ci: use consistent version of uv - #164

Open
michalc wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/consistent-version-of-uv
Open

ci: use consistent version of uv#164
michalc wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/consistent-version-of-uv

Conversation

@michalc

@michalc michalc commented Mar 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Signed-off-by: DBT pre-commit check

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue including relevant motivation and context. Please also include a link to the corresponding JIRA ticket this merge request addresses.

Contributors

Let's acknowledge the people who contributed to the work.

Type of change

  • Refactoring (made code better without changing its behaviour)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

How this has been tested

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

If they are not automated tests please explain why and provide screenshots and/or instructions so they can reproduced.

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have reviewed the PR and ensured no secret values are present

@michalc
michalc requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2026 06:31
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Python Vulnerabilities detected: 2 unique issues.

Low:

Unknown (to be checked):

Signed-off-by: DBT pre-commit check
@michalc
michalc force-pushed the ci/consistent-version-of-uv branch from 6f3122a to 83580f3 Compare March 3, 2026 06:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant