Skip to content

build(deps): Update protobuf-java from 4.35.1 to 4.36.0 - #8809

Open
scala-steward wants to merge 1 commit into
scalameta:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/protobuf-java-4.36.0
Open

build(deps): Update protobuf-java from 4.35.1 to 4.36.0#8809
scala-steward wants to merge 1 commit into
scalameta:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/protobuf-java-4.36.0

Conversation

@scala-steward

@scala-steward scala-steward commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

About this PR

📦 Updates com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java from 4.35.1 to 4.36.0

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

🔍 Files still referring to the old version number

The following files still refer to the old version number (4.35.1).
You might want to review and update them manually.

website/blog/2026-07-23-osmium.md
⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "com.google.protobuf", artifactId = "protobuf-java" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "com.google.protobuf", artifactId = "protobuf-java" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, old-version-remains, commit-count:1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the Protocol Buffers library to the latest supported version.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 42d1cfe6-07b3-4e77-88b5-63e415106936

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f996fdd and 2cb248e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • build.sbt

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 4 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The mtagsShared project updates its protobuf-java dependency from version 4.35.1 to 4.36.0.

Changes

Protobuf dependency update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update protobuf-java version
build.sbt
The mtagsShared project now uses protobuf-java version 4.36.0.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 2cb24

This is a localized dependency-version update with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: tgodzik, matejcerny

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely identifies the protobuf-java dependency update and the exact version change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant