Skip to content

Fix skipping user-modified custom Jira fields - #443

Merged
hluk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-skip-user-modified-custom-fields
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

hluk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-skip-user-modified-custom-fields

Conversation

@hluk

@hluk hluk commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Match changelog entries by fieldId so custom fields set manually in Jira are protected from being overwritten, same as system fields.

JIRA: RHELWF-14821

Assisted-by: Claude Sonnet 5

Match changelog entries by fieldId so custom fields set manually in
Jira are protected from being overwritten, same as system fields.

JIRA: RHELWF-14821

Assisted-by: Claude Sonnet 5
@hluk
hluk requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2026 10:09
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ec97d2c) to head (3d45f1c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #443   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           66        66           
  Lines         3157      3168   +11     
  Branches       150       150           
=========================================
+ Hits          3157      3168   +11     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hluk
hluk merged commit 2b58c6b into main Oct 13, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant