Add Metadata Removal section - #1031
Open
pguillamo-GHIC wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a Metadata Removal section. The list covers many categories, but has no entry for cleaning metadata out of the files people actually share — one of the most common practical privacy actions (EXIF GPS positions, camera serial numbers, author names inside Office documents and PDFs).
The section anchors on the three established open source tools — ExifCleaner, ExifTool, mat2 — and adds QuietMeta.
Disclosure: I am the founder of QuietMeta. It is proprietary, and I have marked it as such in the entry — I understand this weighs against it under your guidelines. What it adds over the open source entries: C2PA Content Credentials validation, Office document cleaning, PDF metadata removal in both of its locations (/Info and XMP), and the cleaned file re-read after every clean to prove what disappeared. The site states explicitly which processing is server-side and which runs in the browser, and says plainly what cannot be measured.
If QuietMeta does not meet the bar, the three open source entries stand on their own — I am happy to drop mine and keep the section.