Repository navigation
Support TURN only or STUN only mode for examples/turn-server #283
Description
Activity
- changed the title
[-]Support TURN inly or STUN only modes[/-][+]Support TURN only or STUN only modes[/+]on Jan 20, 2023 - changed the title
[-]Support TURN only or STUN only modes[/-][+]Support TURN only or STUN only mode for examples/turn-server[/+]on Jan 20, 2023 I assume you are referring to
examples/turn-server?From what I could see in the code... there's no way to use the module in a STUN only way?
No,
turn.Servercurrently does not support filtering which messages are supported.If we would add support for it, I would propose to add support for a message handler which would check whether a given message class is supported. Just like we already have handlers for validating permissions and authentication requests.
Reacted by Dan JenkinsCool idea!
@adrianosela @rg0now What do you think of adding a
OnMessagehandler? Users could justreturn falseif a message should be dropped and that would allow us to filter all nonstun.MethodBindingmessages?Also unlocks users that want to do custom filtering/logging!
Currently if someone wants to only support STUN... they can't disable the TURN server being available. The module should allow you to configure this behaviour in server setup.