feat(scope): expand multilang lexical resolution - #24
Open
odvcencio wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
canopy search scopeandgts_scopeare high-leverage agent surfaces, but their lexical results were strongest in Go and only partial elsewhere. This makes the existing structural index useful at cursor position across more of Canopy's grammar fleet without introducing a separate scope engine or database.Validation
GOWORK=off go test ./...GOWORK=off go vet ./...GOWORK=off go test -race ./internal/scope ./internal/mcp ./cmd/canopycanopy analyze check internal/scope --max-cyclomatic 15 --no-cachecanopy graph dead internal/scope --no-cache --count(0)Risk
The change is additive for JSON consumers (
language) and corrects previously over-broad symbol visibility. Import parsing intentionally omits wildcard and C/C++ include spellings because they do not introduce a single lexical binding.