-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
docs: correct the SEARCH table function reference #786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jackylee-ch
wants to merge
4
commits into
lance-format:main
Choose a base branch
from
jackylee-ch:docs/search-tvf-reference
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4ec6e62
docs: correct the SEARCH table function reference
jackylee-ch ea50f2e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into docs/search-tvf-ref…
jackylee-ch 52baafa
docs: drop the branch and tag clause from the SEARCH scan path
jackylee-ch 4ea4cb3
docs: make the per-fragment scan the general SEARCH fallback
jackylee-ch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't see how search can target a branch or tag is this true or should we drop?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tag is not reachable, you are right to push on it:
versiongoes throughoptionalLong, so a tag name never parses, and there is notag_identifier suffix to carry one. Branch is reachable, sinceresolveLanceTablecallsloadTableand that matchesBRANCH_SUFFIX, sotable => '...docs.branch_audit'lands on the branch andshouldNamespaceFtsScanfalls back, but nothing tests that path. Dropped the clause in 52baafa and left only the catalog-only condition. Happy to put branch back if you want it documented.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two corrections to my last reply. I over-corrected by dropping branch as well as tag, and
nothing tests that pathwas wrong —LanceScanBuilderTest#testBranchFullTextQueryDoesNotUseNamespaceScan(LanceScanBuilderTest.java:374) already assertsshouldNamespaceFtsScan()is false forLanceRef.ofBranch. 4ea4cb3 makes the per-fragment scan the general fallback and lists the three conditions the server-side route needs.