Skip to content

[Explicit State Access] Support decoupled next node in IR where next_value ir uses next_value(state_element=state_element_name, ...) instead of next_value(param=state_read_name, ...)#4580

Draft
copybara-service[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test_945943726

Conversation

@copybara-service

@copybara-service copybara-service Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[Explicit State Access] Support decoupled next node in IR where next_value ir uses next_value(state_element=state_element_name, ...) instead of next_value(param=state_read_name, ...)

…value ir uses `next_value(state_element=state_element_name, ...)` instead of `next_value(param=state_read_name, ...)`

PiperOrigin-RevId: 945943726
@copybara-service copybara-service Bot changed the title [Explicit State Access] Support decoupled next node in delay_info_printer [Explicit State Access] Support decoupled next node in IR where next_value ir uses next_value(state_element=state_element_name, ...) instead of next_value(param=state_read_name, ...) Jul 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant