-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
fix(web-forms#864): performance for selects on large entity lists #1750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
garethbowen
merged 9 commits into
getodk:master
from
garethbowen:searchable-dropdown-performance
Aug 10, 2026
+18
−22
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
22e3db8
fix(web-forms#864): improve performance for selects on large entity l…
garethbowen 4d500bd
disable lazy loading for jsdom
garethbowen e87be43
apply performance improvements to multiselect too
garethbowen 2d660ba
changeset
garethbowen 40c7aea
remove lazy loading - high pain, low gain
garethbowen 922bc97
cleanup and copy label performance improvement to multi
garethbowen a1db42c
remove JSDOM handling code
garethbowen 26fd436
Merge branch 'master' into searchable-dropdown-performance
garethbowen 4a9ce22
Merge branch 'master' into searchable-dropdown-performance
garethbowen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| "@getodk/xforms-engine": patch | ||
| "@getodk/web-forms": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Fixed performance issues when rendering a select with options from a large entity list |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -212,12 +212,7 @@ export class SelectControl | |
|
|
||
| // SelectNode | ||
| getValueOption(value: string): SelectItem | null { | ||
| // Note: this method is a client-facing convenience API for reading state, | ||
| // so it **MUST** read from client-reactive state! | ||
| const valueOption = this.currentState.valueOptions.find((item) => { | ||
| return item.value === value; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const valueOption = this.mapOptionsByValue().get(value); | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This seems to work, and is far faster than scanning through each of the valueOptions. The comment above is concerning though and makes me think I might have missed something. |
||
| return valueOption ?? null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know why we needed this, but it massively slowed down the rendering, because it was doing a n^2 lookup. Do we still need this validation? Is there a better way to do it than on the client every time?