📝 docs(test): follow-up scope for finishing the Anvil-to-Tevm migration - #3
Open
roninjin10 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
📝 docs(test): follow-up scope for finishing the Anvil-to-Tevm migration#3roninjin10 wants to merge 1 commit into
roninjin10 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ration Companion to PR #2. Records the review triage (which reported failures are genuine Tevm gaps vs. migration mistakes) and the sequenced plan for retiring the opt-in Anvil transport lane once tevm wevm#2084 (WebSocket) and wevm#2080 (IPC) publish to npm. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Review-only PR. Adds
test/FOLLOWUP-tevm-migration.md: a single markdown file, no code, no CI, no site changes.Why
I reviewed PR #2 (Complete the Anvil-to-Tevm test migration, 291 files) and posted findings as comments there:
Headline: several of PR #2's "known issues" look like migration bugs rather than Tevm gaps, and conflating them risks writing off real defects.
Verified locally
On PR #2's branch (
f8618fe), afterpnpm install --ignore-scripts(exit 0, tevm 1.0.0-rc.151):Two files that need no fork state cannot run without an archive RPC, because
isUsed()intest/src/tevm.tsis tripped by any property read rather than by actual node use.Scope of this PR
Documentation only.
site/is untouched (vocs sources live undersite/pages; this file is undertest/), so the live docs build is unaffected. Nothing merged.🤖 Generated with Claude Code