Skip to content

Fix multi-column column index rebuild ordering#899

Closed
saulshanabrook wants to merge 1 commit into
egraphs-good:mainfrom
saulshanabrook:codex/core-relations-index-order-fix
Closed

Fix multi-column column index rebuild ordering#899
saulshanabrook wants to merge 1 commit into
egraphs-good:mainfrom
saulshanabrook:codex/core-relations-index-order-fix

Fix multi-column column index rebuild ordering

5740bec
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis completed May 31, 2026 in 0s

1 benchmark regressed

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 22 untouched benchmarks
🆕 1 new benchmark
⏩ 215 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation rust_rule_fib[rule_run_1000] 280.7 ms 202.8 ms +38.39%
🆕 Simulation tests[repro-herbie-vanilla] N/A 1.4 s N/A
Simulation tests[cykjson] 440.2 ms 270.9 ms +62.51%
Simulation tests[python_array_optimize] 1.5 s 1.7 s -7.99%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing saulshanabrook:codex/core-relations-index-order-fix (5740bec) with main (8c1c70b)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 215 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on main (2e1796e) during the generation of this report, so 8c1c70b was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.