[NGT] Consolidation of HLT nano DQM - #51755
Conversation
…allow testing nano as a separate step from HLT
…kflows in the short ph2_hlt matrix
|
type ngt |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
enable nano |
|
test parameters:
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @kfjack, @miquork, @mmusich, @sroychow can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 80KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
AMD_MI300X Comparison SummarySummary:
AMD_W7900 Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L4 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_T4 Comparison SummarySummary:
Max Memory Comparisons exceeding threshold NVIDIA_T4@cms-sw/core-l2 , I found 1 workflow step(s) with memory usage exceeding the error threshold: Expand to see workflows ...
|
|
+hlt |
PR description:
This PR collects a miscellaneous sets of developments to have more thorough testing of the HLT nano flavour produced in the package
HLTrigger/NGTScouting.Main developments:
hltNanoDQMtestProduceNanoHLTwith fresh input data fromCMSSW_20_0_0_pre1.7592and.7721which test the case of HLT nano production out ofFEVTDEBUGHLTinput (from previous step) for both the HLT timing menu and the NGT scouting menu.PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py -l ph2_hlt -i all --ibeosruns fine.scram b runtests_testProduceNanoHLTruns fine.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A