Skip to content

Phase2-gex221 Create a new scenario Run4D128 similar to Run4D127 but with the older version of GE0 geometry description - #51693

Merged
cmsbuild merged 3 commits into
cms-sw:masterfrom
bsunanda:Phase2-gex221
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

Phase2-gex221 Create a new scenario Run4D128 similar to Run4D127 but with the older version of GE0 geometry description#51693
cmsbuild merged 3 commits into
cms-sw:masterfrom
bsunanda:Phase2-gex221

Conversation

@bsunanda

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR description:

Create a new scenario, Run4D128 similar to Run4D127 but with the older version of GE0 geometry description.

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflows (new workflow 38034.0)

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

To be backported to CMSSW_20_0_X

@cmsbuild

cmsbuild commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/Geometry (geometry)
  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
  • Geometry/CMSCommonData (geometry)

@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Dr15Jones, @antoniovagnerini, @bsunanda, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @kfjack, @kpedro88, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @miquork, @sroychow can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @elusian, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @makortel, @martinamalberti, @mmasciov, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @sameasy, @slomeo, @vargasa this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 72KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-937e3f/55296/summary.html
COMMIT: 8c11924
CMSSW: CMSSW_20_1_X_2026-08-12-2300/el9_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/51693/55296/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 44
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3435544
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 76
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3435450
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 18
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 43 files compared)
  • Checked 191 log files, 159 edm output root files, 44 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 43 workflows

@bsunanda

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

+geometry

@mmusich

mmusich commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hi @bsunanda, just for my understanding, what use case will this new scenario serve?

Comment on lines +105 to +106
'Run4D128',
'Run4D128PU',

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please append these new scenarios at the end of the list. Like this, it will change the wf numbering.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bsunanda can you please fix this ASAP?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@mandrenguyen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 good to go here?

@AdrianoDee

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

please abort

@AdrianoDee

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

test parameters:

  • relval_opts = -w upgrade
  • relvals = 38434.0

@AdrianoDee

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-937e3f/55394/summary.html
COMMIT: c2f964e
CMSSW: CMSSW_20_1_X_2026-08-16-2300/el9_amd64_gcc14
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/51693/55394/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3591807
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 18
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3591771
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 18
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 44 files compared)
  • Checked 195 log files, 163 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants