-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat(arithmetic): add SubtractWiden at every tier #20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checked this one carefully, and I do not think it is a defect in this PR — but it did catch an imprecise doc line, which I have now fixed (b8c8e0e).
Two reasons the code is not wrong:
Not introduced here. The three
SubtractWidenoverloads are structurally identical to theAddWidenoverloads directly above them — same shape, same loop, sign flipped. If widening broke the overlap guarantee, it broke it in 0.3.0 whenAddWidenshipped. This PR mirrors that behaviour rather than changing it.The overlap it describes is not reachable by ordinary use. The result span is a different element type from the inputs (
Span<long>vsReadOnlySpan<int>), so the two cannot alias without a deliberateMemoryMarshal.Castof one buffer into both types. There is noresult === leftcall a caller can write here the way they can for the same-width overloads.The deeper point is that a widening operation has no in-place formulation at all: each result element is twice the width of its inputs, so an in-place widening write has nowhere to put the second half. Staging inputs would not rescue an aliased call — it would just make a physically impossible operation silently produce something.
So the fix is on the documentation side, not the implementation: the class summary asserted the overlap guarantee unconditionally, which over-promised for every widening overload including the pre-existing
AddWidenones. It now scopes the guarantee to the same-width overloads and explains why widening is excluded.