Skip to content

ci: build linux/ppc64le release binaries#2279

Open
runlevel5 wants to merge 2 commits into
asdf-vm:masterfrom
runlevel5:release-ppc64le
Open

ci: build linux/ppc64le release binaries#2279
runlevel5 wants to merge 2 commits into
asdf-vm:masterfrom
runlevel5:release-ppc64le

Conversation

@runlevel5

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I'd like to express my gratitude to authors for creating this super useful toolings. I've been using asdf (pre-0.16) in enterprise environments for a quite awhile and was setting up an internal build system to compile asdf (post-0.16) from sources. It works just fine but inconvenient as the maintenance poses a bit of work. I would like to propose that the linux ppc64le binary could be shipped as part of the release process as it would greatly benefit many PowerPC users out there.

@runlevel5 runlevel5 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2026 03:01
@Stratus3D Stratus3D requested a review from Copilot May 14, 2026 12:47

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a linux/ppc64le target to the release build matrix so prebuilt asdf binaries are available for PowerPC LE users.

Changes:

  • Adds an include entry to the build matrix in release-build.yml for goos: linux / goarch: ppc64le.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@Stratus3D Stratus3D left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @runlevel5 , thanks for the PR! Yes, I'd be happy to have our release process generate your ppc64le binaries. I've got a couple questions:

  • Instead of include should we just add ppc64le to the matrix and exclude it on MacOS?
  • Do you think we should run CI tests on ppc64le as well?

@runlevel5

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Do you think we should run CI tests on ppc64le as well?

Ideally you should. Please apply for ppc64le GitHub runner with https://github.com/IBM/actionspz

Instead of include should we just add ppc64le to the matrix and exclude it on MacOS?

Sure I will update the PR

@runlevel5 runlevel5 requested a review from Stratus3D May 15, 2026 15:39
@runlevel5

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@Stratus3D the PR is ready for review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants