Skip to content

Reimplement GammaHeatSource with clearer functionality #322

Description

@smpark7

GammaHeatSource currently takes in a average_fission_heat input parameter that should be the volume-averaged heat source in the graphite/non-fuel region. Users may unknowingly (and wrongly) provide average fission heat from the AverageFissionHeat postprocessor.

This issue can be closed when GammaHeatSource is refactored by renaming existing input parameters or by changing the implementation with the goal of improved user experience.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions