Bump ONNXRuntime to 1.29.0 - #6193
Conversation
|
Did you meanwhile try a newer version like 1.29? |
|
I am doing multiple things at the same time:
so yes, this will eventually have the latest ONNXRuntime. |
8d4cbb2 to
718b00a
Compare
57be5f6 to
df98af0
Compare
2a3524f to
fdc003e
Compare
|
@davidrohr @ChSonnabend this seems to pass the full CI. How do we validate this with actual GPUs? Can you take care of it? |
|
@ktf I will test it as soon as I can and let you know
|
de53189 to
bb96796
Compare
a6e6042 to
edae40d
Compare
5b72a72 to
09d3432
Compare
|
For the record, the FLP Suite CI pipeline, which runs a few workflows through AliECS, passed with the current version of the branch. |
|
Ok thanks. CCDB issues in non production environments understood. Merging since it improves detection of a bunch of stuff. I will deal with the fallout if needed. |
|
@ktf Did you check if anything runs? The current implementation with ROCm execution providers is not supported and MiGraphX is not supported / tested properly on EPNs yet. So why was this commit merged now? |
|
It was merged in order to get the FLP validated mesos aligned to the bumped ONNXRuntime dependencies. Dealing with the updated executor is in our hands so it should converge quickly. |
No description provided.