Skip to content

N3lo benchmark - #2498

Draft
evagroenendijk wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
n3lo_bench
Draft

N3lo benchmark#2498
evagroenendijk wants to merge 6 commits into
masterfrom
n3lo_bench

Conversation

@evagroenendijk

@evagroenendijk evagroenendijk commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The theory cards used to produce DIS predictions for the N3LO benchmark. Related to NNPDF/pinecards#199

reference document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xGwpdlhm93cKxmXuLVRMK4WINwYxmmZJ/edit

@evagroenendijk
evagroenendijk marked this pull request as draft July 8, 2026 14:57
@felixhekhorn
felixhekhorn self-requested a review July 8, 2026 15:25

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you want to read more about FONLL schemes (i.e. FONLL-A vs. FONLL-B vs. FOLL-C etc) see https://inspirehep.net/literature/2818030 or better the original paper https://inspirehep.net/literature/842785

Comment thread nnpdf_data/nnpdf_data/theory_cards/41002200.yaml Outdated
Comment thread nnpdf_data/nnpdf_data/theory_cards/41002201.yaml Outdated
Comment thread nnpdf_data/nnpdf_data/theory_cards/41002000.yaml Outdated
Comment thread nnpdf_data/nnpdf_data/theory_cards/41002000.yaml Outdated
Comment thread nnpdf_data/nnpdf_data/theory_cards/41002200.yaml Outdated
Comment thread nnpdf_data/nnpdf_data/theory_cards/41002000.yaml Outdated
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ Comments: N3LO benchmark, NNPDF4.1 NNLO QCD-only (GM-VFNS=FONLL)
PTO: 2
FNS: FONLL-C
DAMP: 0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@felixhekhorn Do we want DAMP=0 for the FONLL predictions? Seemed like the most simple thing to me, but I don't know if you think differently

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants