Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
74 changes: 70 additions & 4 deletions reference/operations-api/sql.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ title: SQL
<!-- Source: versioned_docs/version-4.7/reference/sql-guide/reserved-word.md -->
<!-- Source: versioned_docs/version-4.7/developers/operations-api/sql-operations.md -->

:::warning
SQL querying is not recommended for production use or on large tables. SQL queries often do not utilize indexes and are not optimized for performance. Use the [REST interface](../rest/overview.md) for production data access — it provides a more stable, secure, and performant interface. SQL is intended for ad-hoc data investigation and administrative queries.
:::info Harper 5.2 introduces a new SQL engine
As of Harper 5.2, SQL runs on a new engine built directly on Harper's indexed storage and Resource API. Queries that can be planned against an index now execute as streaming, index-driven operations with memory bounded by the size of the result — not the size of the table. Queries the engine can't plan against an index automatically fall back to the legacy execution path, returning the same results but with the older full-scan cost. See [Query Performance](#query-performance) for how to keep your queries on the fast path.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is cool, how do users get observability into the ability to plan?


For your most performance-critical production read paths, the [REST interface](../rest/overview.md) remains the recommended choice — it provides a stable, cacheable, index-driven contract. SQL is well suited to ad-hoc investigation, administrative queries, joins, and reporting.
:::

Harper includes a SQL interface supporting SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations. Tables are referenced using `database.table` notation (e.g., `dev.dog`).
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -97,6 +99,69 @@ ORDER BY d.dog_name

---

## Query Performance

Harper 5.2's SQL engine maps SQL clauses onto Harper's native indexed storage. When a query can be planned against an index, it runs as a streaming, index-driven operation with memory bounded by the size of the result — not the size of the table. When it can't, the engine falls back to the legacy path, which fetches candidate rows and evaluates the query in memory, with cost and memory growing with the number of rows scanned.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There should be some form of larger callout here that the fallback incurs full table scans which is problematic for large tables.


On any non-trivial table the difference between these two paths is large. The rules below keep your queries on the fast path.

### Index your predicates, sorts, and join keys

The single most important factor is whether the attributes you filter, sort, and join on are indexed. An equality or range filter on an indexed attribute becomes an index lookup; the same filter on an un-indexed attribute forces a full scan. Define indexes on the attributes your queries actually constrain.

### Queries that run efficiently (index-served)

These map directly to indexed storage operations:

- **Primary-key lookups** — `WHERE id = ...`, `WHERE id IN (...)`.
- **Equality and `IN` on an indexed attribute** — `WHERE status = 'active'`, `WHERE breed_id IN (1, 2, 3)`.
- **Range predicates on an indexed attribute** — `<`, `<=`, `>`, `>=`, and `BETWEEN` (compiled to a bounded index range).
- **`OR` of indexed predicates** — `WHERE a = 1 OR b = 2` is served as a union of index scans, provided **every** branch is an index-driving predicate on an indexed attribute.
- **Prefix `LIKE`** — `WHERE name LIKE 'Har%'` compiles to an indexed `starts_with` scan.
- **`ORDER BY` on an indexed attribute, combined with an indexed `WHERE`** — served directly from index order, with no separate in-memory sort; `LIMIT`/`OFFSET` push into the scan so only the rows you return are read. Without an index-driving `WHERE` condition, an `ORDER BY` currently runs on the legacy path.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Medium: ORDER BY WHERE-requirement is overstated — misses the primary-key exception

validateScannable (sqlEngine/optimizer/rules/validateScannable.ts) accepts a scan with no index-driving WHERE when the pushed sort drives the scan via sortDrivesIndex in sqlEngine/optimizer/whereToConditions.ts — but that check is restricted to the table's primary key:

return attr?.indexed === true && attr.isPrimaryKey === true;

Concretely, SELECT ... FROM t ORDER BY id LIMIT 10 (no WHERE, id = PK) is served on the new engine's index-order scan — it does not fall back to legacy. This is a deliberate, tested exception (comment references design decision "D-219"), confirmed by unitTests/sqlEngine/pipeline.test.js:

  • 'serves a no-WHERE ORDER BY on the PRIMARY KEY via index order (D-219)' — passes on the new engine.
  • 'rejects a no-WHERE ORDER BY on a NON-PK indexed attribute (index order != legacy sort)' — this one does fall back.

The current blanket statement ("Without an index-driving WHERE condition, an ORDER BY currently runs on the legacy path") will mislead readers doing PK-based pagination — a common pattern — into adding an unneeded WHERE or assuming the fast path isn't already available.

(The parallel GROUP BY sentence on the next line is accurate as written — there's no equivalent drives-without-WHERE exception for GROUP BY in the optimizer.)

Suggested fix:

Suggested change
- **`ORDER BY` on an indexed attribute, combined with an indexed `WHERE`** — served directly from index order, with no separate in-memory sort; `LIMIT`/`OFFSET` push into the scan so only the rows you return are read. Without an index-driving `WHERE` condition, an `ORDER BY` currently runs on the legacy path.
- **`ORDER BY` on an indexed attribute, combined with an indexed `WHERE`** — served directly from index order, with no separate in-memory sort; `LIMIT`/`OFFSET` push into the scan so only the rows you return are read. Without an index-driving `WHERE` condition, an `ORDER BY` on a *secondary* indexed attribute runs on the legacy path — except when sorting on the table's **primary key**, which drives the scan from the primary key's natural index order even with no `WHERE` clause.


Generated by Barber AI

- **`GROUP BY` on an indexed attribute, combined with an indexed `WHERE`** — aggregates stream group-by-group with O(1) memory per group (memory is bounded by the group count; every matching row is still read). Without an index-driving `WHERE` condition, a `GROUP BY` currently runs on the legacy path.
- **`INNER`/`LEFT JOIN` on an indexed join key** — executed as an index-nested-loop join (stream the outer table, probe the inner by index). Keep the join key indexed on the inner (probed) table.
- **Column projections** — selecting a subset of columns pushes down so only those attributes are read.

### Queries that fall back to a full scan (avoid on large tables)

These can't be served from an index. They still return correct results, but the engine falls back to the legacy full-scan path, so cost and memory grow with table size:

- **Filters on un-indexed attributes** — any equality, range, or `IN` on an attribute with no index.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if there is another indexed filter in an AND?

- **`OR` where a branch isn't index-driving** — e.g. `WHERE a = 1 OR b = 2` when `b` is un-indexed, or `WHERE a = 1 OR name LIKE '%x%'`. A single un-indexed (or non-index-comparator) branch taints the whole disjunction and forces a scan. When **every** branch is an indexed, index-driving predicate, the `OR` stays on the fast path (see above).
- **Suffix / substring `LIKE`** — `LIKE '%x'` and `LIKE '%x%'` (only prefix `LIKE 'x%'` is index-served). A suffix/contains `LIKE` combined (via `AND`) with an indexed predicate is applied as a cheap residual filter on the indexed result, so pair it with an indexed condition.
- **`!=` / `<>` and `NOT` negations** — matching "everything except" a value can't use an index.
- **`ORDER BY` with no indexed filter to drive it** — a table-wide ordered scan on an un-indexed sort key.
- **`SEARCH_JSON`** — evaluates JSONata over each candidate row's nested JSON; it is not index-backed. Narrow the candidate set with an indexed `WHERE` condition first.
- **`RIGHT`/`FULL OUTER JOIN`, no-`WHERE` `UPDATE`/`DELETE`, `COUNT(DISTINCT ...)`** — the new engine doesn't plan these yet, so they run on the legacy engine (correct results, legacy cost).

Note that `UNION`, sub-`SELECT`, and `INSERT … SELECT` are not supported by either engine — see the [Features Matrix](#features-matrix).

### The fallback contract

The engine runs in `auto` mode by default: it executes every query it can plan on the new engine and transparently falls back to the legacy engine for anything it can't. A query that falls back returns exactly what the legacy engine would — **its results don't change, only its performance profile.** Fallbacks are logged (`SQL engine v2 fallback: ...`) with the reason, which is a useful signal for finding queries worth an added index or a reshape. (For queries the new engine _does_ plan, it corrects a few long-standing legacy quirks — see [Behavior changes from the legacy engine](#behavior-changes-from-the-legacy-engine).)

### Behavior changes from the legacy engine

For queries the new engine plans (the default under `auto`), a handful of non-standard legacy behaviors are corrected, so you may see different — standard-SQL-conformant — results after upgrading:

- **Aggregates over an empty result set** return `NULL` for `SUM`, `AVG`, `MIN`, and `MAX` (and `0` for `COUNT`), per the SQL standard. The legacy engine returned `0` for `SUM` and omitted `MIN`/`MAX` from the response entirely.
- **`MIN`/`MAX` over text columns** return the lexicographically smallest/largest value. The legacy engine produced no result for string `MIN`/`MAX`.
- **`NULL` never equals `NULL` in a join key.** Rows whose join key is `NULL` on either side no longer match each other (three-valued logic). The legacy engine incorrectly joined `NULL` to `NULL`.
- **`OFFSET` past the end of a result returns no rows.** The legacy engine could still return rows when the `OFFSET` exceeded the number of matches.
- **A `NULL`-valued expression result is returned as an explicit `null`** rather than omitted from the row. A computed column or `COALESCE` that evaluates to `NULL` — or `UPPER(<null>)` — now yields `null` (the legacy engine dropped the key, and `UPPER` of a `NULL` returned the literal string `"NULL"`).

These are deliberate corrections toward standard SQL, applied when the new engine serves the query — not fallbacks. If your application depended on a legacy quirk, adjust for the standard behavior.

### Practical guidance

- Index every attribute you filter, sort, or join on.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth calling out performance and storage implications of over indexing?

- Prefer prefix `LIKE 'x%'` over `LIKE '%x%'`; back a substring search with a separate indexed predicate, or model it as a dedicated indexed attribute.
- Constrain the row set with an indexed `WHERE` before leaning on `ORDER BY`, `GROUP BY`, joins, or `SEARCH_JSON`.
- Reach for the [REST interface](../rest/overview.md) on your hottest production read paths for a cacheable, index-driven contract; keep SQL for ad-hoc investigation, joins, and reporting.

---

## Features Matrix

| INSERT | |
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -330,16 +395,17 @@ Geospatial data must be stored using the [GeoJSON standard](https://geojson.org/

## Reserved Words

If a database, table, or attribute name conflicts with a reserved word, wrap it in backticks or brackets:
If a database, table, attribute, or column-alias name conflicts with a reserved word, wrap it in backticks or brackets. This applies to `AS` aliases too: an unquoted reserved word such as `AS total` fails to parse — quote it, as in the last example below.

```sql
SELECT * FROM data.`ASSERT`
SELECT * FROM data.[ASSERT]
SELECT SUM(qty) AS `total` FROM data.dog
```

<details>
<summary>Full reserved word list</summary>

ABSOLUTE, ACTION, ADD, AGGR, ALL, ALTER, AND, ANTI, ANY, APPLY, ARRAY, AS, ASSERT, ASC, ATTACH, AUTOINCREMENT, AUTO_INCREMENT, AVG, BEGIN, BETWEEN, BREAK, BY, CALL, CASE, CAST, CHECK, CLASS, CLOSE, COLLATE, COLUMN, COLUMNS, COMMIT, CONSTRAINT, CONTENT, CONTINUE, CONVERT, CORRESPONDING, COUNT, CREATE, CROSS, CUBE, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, CURSOR, DATABASE, DECLARE, DEFAULT, DELETE, DELETED, DESC, DETACH, DISTINCT, DOUBLEPRECISION, DROP, ECHO, EDGE, END, ENUM, ELSE, EXCEPT, EXISTS, EXPLAIN, FALSE, FETCH, FIRST, FOREIGN, FROM, GO, GRAPH, GROUP, GROUPING, HAVING, HDB_HASH, HELP, IF, IDENTITY, IS, IN, INDEX, INNER, INSERT, INSERTED, INTERSECT, INTO, JOIN, KEY, LAST, LET, LEFT, LIKE, LIMIT, LOOP, MATCHED, MATRIX, MAX, MERGE, MIN, MINUS, MODIFY, NATURAL, NEXT, NEW, NOCASE, NO, NOT, NULL, OFF, ON, ONLY, OFFSET, OPEN, OPTION, OR, ORDER, OUTER, OVER, PATH, PARTITION, PERCENT, PLAN, PRIMARY, PRINT, PRIOR, QUERY, READ, RECORDSET, REDUCE, REFERENCES, RELATIVE, REPLACE, REMOVE, RENAME, REQUIRE, RESTORE, RETURN, RETURNS, RIGHT, ROLLBACK, ROLLUP, ROW, SCHEMA, SCHEMAS, SEARCH, SELECT, SEMI, SET, SETS, SHOW, SOME, SOURCE, STRATEGY, STORE, SYSTEM, SUM, TABLE, TABLES, TARGET, TEMP, TEMPORARY, TEXTSTRING, THEN, TIMEOUT, TO, TOP, TRAN, TRANSACTION, TRIGGER, TRUE, TRUNCATE, UNION, UNIQUE, UPDATE, USE, USING, VALUE, VERTEX, VIEW, WHEN, WHERE, WHILE, WITH, WORK
ABSOLUTE, ACTION, ADD, AGGR, ALL, ALTER, AND, ANTI, ANY, APPLY, ARRAY, AS, ASSERT, ASC, ATTACH, AUTOINCREMENT, AUTO_INCREMENT, AVG, BEGIN, BETWEEN, BREAK, BY, CALL, CASE, CAST, CHECK, CLASS, CLOSE, COLLATE, COLUMN, COLUMNS, COMMIT, CONSTRAINT, CONTENT, CONTINUE, CONVERT, CORRESPONDING, COUNT, CREATE, CROSS, CUBE, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, CURSOR, DATABASE, DECLARE, DEFAULT, DELETE, DELETED, DESC, DETACH, DISTINCT, DOUBLEPRECISION, DROP, ECHO, EDGE, END, ENUM, ELSE, EXCEPT, EXISTS, EXPLAIN, FALSE, FETCH, FIRST, FOREIGN, FROM, GO, GRAPH, GROUP, GROUPING, HAVING, HDB_HASH, HELP, IF, IDENTITY, IS, IN, INDEX, INNER, INSERT, INSERTED, INTERSECT, INTO, JOIN, KEY, LAST, LET, LEFT, LIKE, LIMIT, LOOP, MATCHED, MATRIX, MAX, MERGE, MIN, MINUS, MODIFY, NATURAL, NEXT, NEW, NOCASE, NO, NOT, NULL, OFF, ON, ONLY, OFFSET, OPEN, OPTION, OR, ORDER, OUTER, OVER, PATH, PARTITION, PERCENT, PLAN, PRIMARY, PRINT, PRIOR, QUERY, READ, RECORDSET, REDUCE, REFERENCES, RELATIVE, REPLACE, REMOVE, RENAME, REQUIRE, RESTORE, RETURN, RETURNS, RIGHT, ROLLBACK, ROLLUP, ROW, SCHEMA, SCHEMAS, SEARCH, SELECT, SEMI, SET, SETS, SHOW, SOME, SOURCE, STRATEGY, STORE, SYSTEM, SUM, TABLE, TABLES, TARGET, TEMP, TEMPORARY, TEXTSTRING, THEN, TIMEOUT, TO, TOP, TOTAL, TRAN, TRANSACTION, TRIGGER, TRUE, TRUNCATE, UNION, UNIQUE, UPDATE, USE, USING, VALUE, VERTEX, VIEW, WHEN, WHERE, WHILE, WITH, WORK

</details>