Skip to content

Add LOC entries for Coop Missions. - #450

Draft
Yuchenjimmy wants to merge 1 commit into
FAForever:masterfrom
Yuchenjimmy:master
Draft

Add LOC entries for Coop Missions.#450
Yuchenjimmy wants to merge 1 commit into
FAForever:masterfrom
Yuchenjimmy:master

Conversation

@Yuchenjimmy

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Currently several coop missions doesn't have any LOC entries, I would like to add them in.

@Yuchenjimmy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Any suggestion for the naming style?
e.g. FAF_Coop_Fort_Clarke_Assault_M4P2Description v.s. FAF_Coop_Fort_Clarke_Assault_001

@speed2CZ

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Yuchenjimmy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ok, NP.

@Yuchenjimmy

Yuchenjimmy commented Mar 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Since LOC entries would interfere mission order, I decided to add a function auto generating LOC entries for FAF Coops, instead of directly editing scenario file.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2face4d9-c9fd-4186-af16-18f76c3784d0

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Yuchenjimmy
Yuchenjimmy force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 40207f2 to 948d302 Compare August 4, 2026 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants