docs(gap): integrate visual and owner-handoff evidence - #1602
Conversation
Move the inspected smoke findings into a dedicated gap-owner lane and link each observed defect to its proposed successor and remaining acceptance proof. Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe baseline document updates Search validation evidence, adds owner succession and Noema review-gateway records, and changes the baseline metadata to version 1.5 observed on 2026-09-09. ChangesBaseline documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low — Defer this documentation update because it only refreshes the canonical gap ledger with Search evidence, owner handoffs, and review-gateway records. Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change updates the product technical-gap baseline with Search, ownership, review-gateway, and metadata evidence. No current merge-blocking risk is identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Visual Inspection receipt (exact head |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
seonghobae
added
documentation
ChatGPT Codex Connector
|
Independent Visual Inspection completed by main: retrieved artifact10042037726 from Application CI run34189161122, name naruon-full-product-smoke-1600-d30f0b7c403bcf2b06d84b27f2744d5c17177294. Opened every retained PNG directly:10/10 desktop images,1440x1024 (home,mail,calendar,tasks,projects,search,data,security,settings,ai-hub). Confirmed English skip-link on Home/Projects/Security; source-linked Home copy; raw source/thread and sender_context in Search; intent/ETag/If-Match copy in Calendar; verifier command/schema/exit-code copy in Data; signed-session and event-code copy in Security; Settings content behind fixed header; clipped Projects nav and Mail toast covering primary navigation. These are mocked CI screenshots, not live provider/write evidence. This artifact contains10 desktop images, no mobile images; the earlier20-image local observation remains a distinct receipt. AGENTS successor is #15491261c32. Product visual acceptance is not established by artifact availability. |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
…com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon into codex/visual-gap-evidence-successor
|
@coderabbitai review 현재 exact head |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo '== checked-out commit =='
git rev-parse HEAD
git status --short
echo '== PR metadata =='
gh pr view 1602 --repo ContextualWisdomLab/naruon \
--json number,state,isDraft,baseRefOid,headRefOid,headRefName,url \
--jq '.'
echo '== merge-base and changed files =='
base="$(git merge-base HEAD origin/develop)"
printf 'merge-base=%s\n' "$base"
git diff --stat "$base"...HEAD
git diff --name-status "$base"...HEAD
echo '== document diff =='
git diff --find-renames --unified=60 "$base"...HEAD -- docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
echo '== document outline and relevant lines =='
rg -n -C 5 '(v1\.3|1603|Search|visual|artifact|acceptance)' docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
echo '== referenced PR metadata =='
for pr in 1578 1599 1600 1601 1603; do
printf '\n#%s\n' "$pr"
gh pr view "$pr" --repo ContextualWisdomLab/naruon \
--json number,state,isDraft,headRefOid,baseRefOid,url,title \
--jq '.'
doneLength of output: 25960 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/naruon"
echo '== `#1602` exact-head workflow runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/d186427fe52fcee9d62329d56f632369ba7d79ef/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | [.name, .status, .conclusion, .details_url] | `@tsv`'
echo '== `#1602` reviews and review comments =='
gh pr view 1602 --repo "$repo" --json reviews,comments \
--jq '{reviews: [.reviews[] | {author: .author.login, state: .state, commit: .commit.oid}], comments: [.comments[] | {author: .author.login, body: .body}]}'
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/1602/comments?per_page=100" \
--jq '.[] | [.user.login, .commit_id, .path, (.line // 0 | tostring), .body] | `@tsv`'
echo '== `#1603` file list and diff =='
gh pr view 1603 --repo "$repo" --json files,commits,comments,reviews \
--jq '{files: [.files[] | {path, additions, deletions}], commits: [.commits[] | {oid: .oid, messageHeadline: .messageHeadline}], reviews: [.reviews[] | {author: .author.login, state: .state, commit: .commit.oid}], comments: [.comments[] | {author: .author.login, body: .body}]}'
gh pr diff 1603 --repo "$repo" --color=never
echo '== `#1603` exact-head check runs =='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/2b07c42e99c98d006b60f527576025bf49b91855/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | [.name, .status, .conclusion, .details_url] | `@tsv`'Length of output: 34622
Finding —
이 동작은 해당 PR의 fail-closed customer-copy 목표와 일치하지 않습니다.
|
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
|
Exact head
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
dec3cecdd2b523a3fd44b5f8e4da193743e7cb39. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Required Noema Review/noema-review: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34203689952/job/101991293808)
- noema-review check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/naruon/actions/runs/34203689952/job/101991293808)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
OpenCode Review Overview
|
|
Canonical gap-ledger handoff, 2026-09-08: please incorporate on the next ordinary source successor rather than allowing parallel edits. (1) NetworkGraph #1593 live branch drift deleted |
Canonical ledger refresh handoff — 2026-09-08
Fresh deltas that the next canonical ledger commit must reconcile from live authority:
The current ledger head |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
seonghobae
changed the title
|
Gap-ledger succession handoff — 2026-09-10 live reread:
Please land this only through the canonical |
|
Gap-ledger handoff, 2026-09-10: canonical NetworkGraph owner #1593 advanced non-force from |
|
Follow-up to handoff |
|
#1625 succession update for the next ordinary gap-ledger successor:
Please preserve this as incoming evidence only until the canonical baseline branch itself is safely advanced; no competing |
|
Canonical owner succession update for the next ordinary baseline revision (do not treat as protected-integrated yet):
Keep the baseline claim at Draft/not-integrated semantics until the owner actually reaches protected |
|
Follow-up to the prior owner handoff after completing the remaining governance-stack restack:
Use these heads instead of the older |
|
NetworkGraph succession update for the next canonical baseline revision:
Keep the baseline Draft/not-integrated semantics until #1623/#1593 are protected-integrated and #1628 has exact-head terminal evidence plus measured/rendered acceptance. |
|
Baseline succession handoff — 2026-09-10 새 generated security PR #1629를 live finding부터 재검증했습니다. Generated head 실제 hosted RED는 별개였습니다. #1629를 Close/force-rewrite하지 않고 ordinary two-parent reconciliation Baseline에는 #1629를 CRITICAL fix/landed feature로 기록하지 말고 |
|
Search succession refresh — live #1603 is now exact |
|
Current Naruon owner-state handoff (2026-09-10): please fold into the next ordinary baseline successor; do not rewrite this ledger from a competing branch.
No force push, self-approval, gate weakening, dummy requeue, or cross-owner source copy was used. |
|
Canonical ledger handoff — 2026-09-10 fresh stack repair The Today/UI descendant stack has been ordinary-restacked onto current canonical frontend security owner
All four source-changing restacks invalidate predecessor checks/reviews as current-head evidence. Fresh Do not record any of these as integrated or GREEN until current-head hosted execution, review and applicable rendered/accessibility/locale evidence exist. #1623 itself remains Draft; central CodeQL is RED and required Strix is still in progress, so the descendant stack is not merge-authorized. |
|
Additional canonical-ledger handoff — new PR reconciliation (updated after review repair) #1630 and #1631 appeared after the earlier sweep and required ownership repair.
Neither PR is protected-integrated or release-authorized. |
|
2026-09-10 handoff — new generated #1632 was verified as a duplicate of the existing NetworkGraph memoization hypothesis already preserved by #1622, not a new measured performance owner. Generated head |
|
2026-09-10 terminal-evidence handoff for canonical frontend security owner #1623: exact |
|
Canonical ledger handoff — 2026-09-10 fresh Naruon writer evidence.
Please integrate these observations into |
|
Follow-up to handoff CodeRabbit on A fresh CodeRabbit review has been requested on |
|
Final #1635 review-state handoff for this pass: CodeRabbit re-reviewed exact |
|
2026-09-10 Naruon single-writer handoff — accessibility owner decomposition is now source-bearing and TDD-scoped.
Please update only |
|
Additional canonical owner handoff — Fresh Naruon evidence: protected Do not widen Naruon branch protection, retarget feature PRs to |
|
Follow-up exact-head handoff after review-driven repair:
Please update only the canonical baseline document on #1602; no product-source copy. |
|
Final review-evidence update for this pass: #1635 exact |
|
Canonical Gap handoff — 2026-09-10 current run
Do not turn any of these into protected/merge GREEN until exact-head executable receipts exist and prerequisites are protected-integrated. No competing gap-ledger source write was made from these product lanes. |
|
Naruon current-state handoff — 2026-09-10 Today accessibility successor #1638 advanced from Fresh compare to #1608 |
|
Canonical ledger handoff — 2026-09-10 Checksum owner #1361 was stale against the live protected ancestry and has been repaired without a competing product lane. Current authority is A previously unresolved CodeRabbit finding was freshly verified as real: lone surrogate text decoded from JSON reached Please make |
|
Checksum handoff correction: #1361 advanced once more, docs-only, to exact |
|
Canonical ledger handoff — Naruon checksum lane #1361 advanced after a fresh contract audit.
Please update |
|
#1361 checksum succession handoff — 2026-09-10 Direct checksum head Owner-preserving temporary integration PR #1641 ordinary-merged unchanged #1623 into Exact |
|
Correction to the #1361 handoff: the runs listed in my preceding handoff are not current-base execution evidence. #1641 advanced #1361's head to Canonical |
|
Current owner-handoff evidence for the canonical gap ledger (no competing baseline source write):
Please make the next baseline source update code-current to these exact heads without promoting either lane to protected/released completion. |
|
Superseding the earlier #1643 handoff with the current exact head after review repair: |
1 participant
Current authority — 2026-09-09
develop@042b0c70531b229af3acbd0421a2f23098d848b34450b97bc9e32a0150b7bd67888860d24f56f00779dd038d2d46b9c14a0160dfe59c5671f8b07883docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdonlyDirect canonical repair
The baseline had described Search owner #1603 at predecessor
622dc08d..., despite its live exact head having advanced to462b134acf858061019d3ffe37b7b3d60e6f7e74. Ordinary child commit4450b97repairs that stale-current claim on the existing single-writer branch.The refreshed row records:
Colleaguenormalization, all four bounded customer action translations, and neutral fail-closed copy for unknown values;462b134...;.github#1929, plus failed OpenCode/Noema gates, absent qualifying current-head approval and absent durable responsive-browser inspection;Baseline version is 1.5, observed 2026-09-09. The prior valid owner-succession evidence from
0811b6e...remains in ancestry and unchanged. No force-push, destructive rebase, competing ledger writer, gate weakening or historical-evidence transfer was used.Exact-head evidence boundary
For unchanged
4450b97b..., all repository-owned PR workflows are now terminal-success:34249620626— success34249621041— success34249620684— success34249620594— success34249620552— success34249620774— successcoverage-source-tree/coverage-evidence— successCodeRabbit submitted exact-head
APPROVEDat 2026-09-08T16:16:55Z and current inline review-thread count is zero. This approval is valid independent evidence but does not override failed required review gates.OpenCode — terminal CHANGES_REQUESTED, no Naruon source finding
The first exact-head
opencode-reviewcheck failed before its dispatched verdict existed. The authenticated current-head verdict later arrived at 2026-09-08T16:31:14Z as CHANGES_REQUESTED for4450b97...; its only HIGH finding is the same-head failedRequired Noema Review/noema-review. It does not identify a defect indocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. The check remains fail-closed until the required peer gate is clean. Do not manufacture a no-op requeue commit.Noema — terminal owner-path failure
Required Noema Review run
34249618694, job102140984266, is failure on this exact head. The job successfully validated the live head, minted its repository-scoped reviewer token, provisioned.github@7fd571dbcdbae6acf29d8f4ee704d7ba6297e4db, vendored contextual-orchestrator414f22973658c4ddc3d4320fcf7acd9b4e8ba991, and used onlymodel=orchestrator/freewith caller attempts=1.The sidecar admitted 59 free routes / selected 24, encountered multiple provider 429/404/timeout outcomes, eventually reported one ready preflight route and a successful gateway chat/completions preflight, but the actual Noema verdict request then failed closed with HTTP 429 after 155.6 s,
phase=response_error, served modeldeepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-flash-0731. Artifact publication succeeded. This is not evidence for a paid, local or direct-provider fallback and is not a Naruon source fix.Fresh reproduction has been handed to canonical owner contextual-orchestrator#1106.
.github#2042remains the consumer bridge-removal path after immutable owner release;.github#2035remains review-publication scope. Completion is owner RED → immutable CO release →.githubreleased-version bump/bridge deletion → unchanged Naruon exact-head required-review GREEN.strixon this exact head is terminal skipped, not positive execution evidence; do not record it as a passing review.Succession and merge boundary
#1611 remains open/Draft until protected-tree verification proves its valid owner-handoff evidence is fully inherited and no unique valid delta remains. Merge #1602 only when the unchanged exact head has every then-live required context terminal-success, zero valid unresolved current-head findings/threads, and a qualifying independent approval. At present Noema is failed and OpenCode has current-head CHANGES_REQUESTED, so merge is prohibited even though repository-owned workflows and CodeRabbit are GREEN.
No self-approval, bypass/admin merge, force-push, destructive rebase, dummy/no-op requeue commit, synthetic status, central-workflow copy, authorization widening, provider/model fallback expansion, second ledger writer or gate weakening.
Summary by CodeRabbit