Skip to content

feat(analysis): bind summarizes-edge refusals to an analysis-run profile - #484

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004from
feat/summarizes-edge-analysis-run-gap-004
Draft

feat(analysis): bind summarizes-edge refusals to an analysis-run profile#484
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004from
feat/summarizes-edge-analysis-run-gap-004

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Consolidation status

fold_into_landing_vehiclesummarizes_edge_v1 / tepp.summarizes_edge.v1 is a Validation / Analysis Run profile and changes the same shared integration surface as #416 (Cargo.lock, crates/analysis_engine/Cargo.toml, crates/analysis_engine/src/lib.rs, DOCUMENTATION.md, docs/TRACEABILITY.md, and docs/adr/README.md). It is therefore a Draft fold child of #416, not an independent protected-main landing authority.

Current exact child head: 9a1be78b5342ff65e3cf2aac1e9331c68943f246. Current surviving #416 head: 0b7155cc238defb1e55129ff3000658f04b343cf. Retargeting is non-destructive; unique source/tests/doctoring remain on this branch until a real conflict-resolving fold verifies their inheritance.

Preserved profile evidence

  • Profile/contract summarizes_edge_v1; schema tepp.summarizes_edge.v1.
  • Binds the existing protected-main summarizes_edge summary-versus-source identity boundary.
  • Request cutoff equality is typed through KnowledgeCutoff::instant().
  • AvailableTime <= knowledge_cutoff admission occurs before duplicate-identity checks.
  • MAX_EVIDENCE_UNITS bounds execution admission and artifact validation.
  • Not GPU, not MCMC, not topic birth/split/merge, and not implemented-main.

ADR 0077 is implementation lineage pending repository-wide ADR normalization under #437; it does not create a new bounded context or branch-local architecture authority.

Merge authority

Only the eventual surviving #416/successor exact head counts after the fold. Reacquire all required current-head workflows, resolve current review threads, and satisfy live ruleset 18156473, which currently requires one qualifying current-head approval and dismisses stale approvals after pushes. No self-approval, force push, destructive rebase, routine admin bypass, or child-head evidence transfer.

GAP-004: cutoff-safe summarizes_edge_v1 / tepp.summarizes_edge.v1.
Binds refuse_summary_as_transition and refuse_summary_as_source_identity
already on protected main. Distinct from retrospective-edge, role-contradiction,
subevent-containment, inferred-status, episode-membership, relation-absence,
outcome-order, membership-target, and copy-identity. identity_recovery_rate stays library-side.
A future-unavailable assignment must not change a historical cutoff
result. Duplicate detection now runs only on assignments admitted at
the knowledge cutoff; duplicates among admitted evidence still fail closed.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from main to feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004 September 2, 2026 14:38
@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004 to main September 2, 2026 18:08
@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from main to feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004 September 2, 2026 18:29
@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004 to main September 3, 2026 00:14
@seonghobae
seonghobae changed the base branch from main to feat/copy-identity-analysis-run-gap-004 September 3, 2026 01:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant